What is reality?
Posted: 25 Jan 2011
Don't worry, I'm going all deep and philosophical, but I watched a Horizon program recently, titled What Is Reality?
They did the double slit experiment, shoving light through 2 slits and observing the resulting wave patterns. No surprises there. They did it again, but fired one photon at a time. i.e. The Photon can pass through one slit or the other and so in theory, you should get 'hits' where the photons pass through and 'blanks' where they don't. Surprisingly, they get the same result as passing through continous light. This should be impossible as the single photon should take one path or the other - not both.
When photon detectors are placed at both slits, the pattern changes to the theoretically expected one i.e. one photon through either slit. Remove the detectors, and the resultant pattern changes back. This isn't a newly found observation, but top Physicists can't explain it. The experiment suggests that the photon can be in two places at once, but as soon as you try and look - it can't.
The program then led onto a computer. Not like the ones we have where all info, at the heart of ther machine is binary, i.e. 1 or 0. This new computer, could be in both states at the same time (in theory - it's still under development). It consisted of a small science lab, with approx a dozen 'boxes of electronic wizardry' and other supplementary stuff. Easily fit into the back of a tranny van. Once working, it'll be more 'powerful' than either (1) the most advanced computer we have today, but the size of earth or (2) all the computational power in the world combined.
It was such an interesting program, I can't find it on iplayer, otherwise I'll post a linky.
There were some other theories that I just couldn't get my head round, such as that 'basic element information', like energy, can not be created or destroyed. therefore, black holes, as we have been led to understand them (i.e. nothing - not even light can escape) can not exist. So, it was put forward that all that we see, was merely a projection of the/a collation of 'basic element information' that is projected, rather like a 3D holographic image, from the periphery of a black hole!
I really do wonder if some of these Physicists have lost the plot, can't explain shit and have to make something up to explain a bit more????
Another chap wrote the 6 (maybe wrong number but approx correct) equations that could describe all he could see, and that maybe the world is just made up of Math (no, that's not mass spoken with a lisp, but as in Mathematics). Fucking nut boxes!
What I was impressed with was the Maths Genii, who predicted/calculated that there were a further 'X' particles beyond protons, but explaining them was too complex. So they devised a 'grouping' system and managed to find all six groups in a USA smaller version of CERN.
In fact, I'm going to start another thread about summat else
They did the double slit experiment, shoving light through 2 slits and observing the resulting wave patterns. No surprises there. They did it again, but fired one photon at a time. i.e. The Photon can pass through one slit or the other and so in theory, you should get 'hits' where the photons pass through and 'blanks' where they don't. Surprisingly, they get the same result as passing through continous light. This should be impossible as the single photon should take one path or the other - not both.
When photon detectors are placed at both slits, the pattern changes to the theoretically expected one i.e. one photon through either slit. Remove the detectors, and the resultant pattern changes back. This isn't a newly found observation, but top Physicists can't explain it. The experiment suggests that the photon can be in two places at once, but as soon as you try and look - it can't.
The program then led onto a computer. Not like the ones we have where all info, at the heart of ther machine is binary, i.e. 1 or 0. This new computer, could be in both states at the same time (in theory - it's still under development). It consisted of a small science lab, with approx a dozen 'boxes of electronic wizardry' and other supplementary stuff. Easily fit into the back of a tranny van. Once working, it'll be more 'powerful' than either (1) the most advanced computer we have today, but the size of earth or (2) all the computational power in the world combined.
It was such an interesting program, I can't find it on iplayer, otherwise I'll post a linky.
There were some other theories that I just couldn't get my head round, such as that 'basic element information', like energy, can not be created or destroyed. therefore, black holes, as we have been led to understand them (i.e. nothing - not even light can escape) can not exist. So, it was put forward that all that we see, was merely a projection of the/a collation of 'basic element information' that is projected, rather like a 3D holographic image, from the periphery of a black hole!
I really do wonder if some of these Physicists have lost the plot, can't explain shit and have to make something up to explain a bit more????
Another chap wrote the 6 (maybe wrong number but approx correct) equations that could describe all he could see, and that maybe the world is just made up of Math (no, that's not mass spoken with a lisp, but as in Mathematics). Fucking nut boxes!
What I was impressed with was the Maths Genii, who predicted/calculated that there were a further 'X' particles beyond protons, but explaining them was too complex. So they devised a 'grouping' system and managed to find all six groups in a USA smaller version of CERN.
In fact, I'm going to start another thread about summat else